insisted that the people below the PRD, PT and Convergence have nothing to do with either the PRI or the PAN, considering that both parties are responsible for the national tragedy.
and there were even those who qualified as a campaign based rancor.
is true that the campaign was somewhat simplistic and lack of depth, it is true that, at least for some, the campaign had some political purpose, it is also true that the campaign lacked a concrete proposal. And yet it is also true that the counter-campaign simplified and caricatured (horse machete swords!) The original idea of \u200b\u200bthe proposed Rius and company. That is, there was something in the background of the campaign that most of his critics simply ignore: the weariness of the population with the current situation, the frustration at the lack of success of the strategy against drug trafficking, despair against the unusual increase in violence in recent months and the inevitable feeling that the strategy should be reviewed and modified. That was ultimately what prompted the campaign and what the perception is an important part of the Mexican population. What the campaign did not criticize the criminals? It is true that he did not explicit, but it is obvious that they are condemned. No way no. What crimes are committed by criminals and not the government? Oh, truism, how right you have! All this, however, is completely irrelevant to this discussion. What is important is that the government and some of its apologists still determined to defend a strategy that has clearly not worked and that, for some reason not entirely clear, the violence has risen sharply, especially in states where they have carried out joint operations.
What above mean? It is time for the government to reflect on the current strategy. Starts by recognizing that what matters most affected and the public at this time is the issue of violence and not the drug kingpins (not the same, although many do not want to see it well). That we must continue the war on drugs, yes, but in a more intelligent, less confrontational. That the fight against drug trafficking organizations should be attacking them where it hurts, that is, the financial part. That the strategy should be redirected to pursue, arrest and prosecute those responsible for violence in the country and reduce the flow of arms into the country. But above all, that it should respect the rule of law. It's useless to fight violent crime with the brute force of state and must respect human rights. Failure to do so, we will continue immersed in this wave of violence and, worse still, the process could continue weakening in itself diminished our rule of law. Source: http://www.animalpolitico.com/blogueros-el-vaso-medio-vacio/2011/01/21/% C2% A1no-more-% C2% A1ya-enough-of-simplifications /
Author: Miguel Badillo * Section: Office Paper The health of the President of the Republic is a matter of national security. Their decisions affect, for better or for worse, the lives of Mexicans, and determine the political, economic and social with other countries. Therefore, the national security cabinet to worry about and deal with what happened a few days ago his boss Felipe Calderón, who, to a climate of terror and pressure by the threat of drug trafficking, has reached a mind to deny these facts and repeated insistently than before.
Two weeks ago, Calderon said in a dialogue with civil society organizations, who had never described as a "war" fighting the federal government holds against organized crime. Immediately, the media and exhibited denied the president-with photos and voice recordings-how since he came to Los Pinos has been repeated time and again that it is a "war" (sic
In the United States, the State Department agrees with the urgent need to review if Calderon is able to govern. So he did know the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who, according to Wikileaks leaks on Mexico, asked one of the cables dated December 2009 to report how they are affecting the personality of President Felipe Calderón and his way of ruling the adverse news of the "war" against drug trafficking and economic crisis in Mexico. Obama's government also believes that the Mexican president can be a danger to U.S. national security. a bipolar affective disorder
For reference, Wikipedia explains the disease of bipolar disorder, also known as bipolar disorder, formerly manic-depressive psychosis as is the psychiatric diagnosis that describes a mood disorder characterized by presence of one or more episodes of abnormally high energy levels, cognition and mood. Add reflected clinically in states of mania or, in milder cases, hypomania with concomitant or alternating episodes of depression, so that the affected is usually somewhere between joy and sadness in a much more marked than people without this condition.
general, says Wikipedia, has expression by an electrochemical imbalance in brain neurotransmitters. Additionally, due to the characteristics of bipolar disorder, individuals have a higher risk of mortality from accidents and natural causes such as cardiovascular disease. Despite being considered a chronic disorder with high morbidity and mortality, comprehensive care that addresses all aspects involved, biological, psychological and social, can achieve complete remission of the crisis, hence the great importance of diagnosis the hit is correct.
The basic element for the treatment of bipolar disorder is the awareness of the problem, your knowledge on the part of the patient and their relatives through sicoeducación to enable them to cope with the crisis, not unsubstantiated fears and the most valid tools as well as prevent relapse.
personalized drug therapy, especially during the stages of imbalance, is another key. Benzodiazepines, antipsychotics and mood stabilizers are the drugs most used. Patterns of mood changes may be cyclical, often starting with a hobby that ends in a deep depression. Sometimes, they can dominate or manic episodes of depression. Some of these disorders are called "rapid cycling" because the mood can change several times within a very short period of time. Other times it is called "mixed state", in which the depressive thoughts can appear in an episode of mania or vice versa. There are still two years to pass the current cabinet to retirement. If in 2010 there were over 15 000 deaths for 2011 and 2012 the level of violence could even be worse. It is therefore important that all decisions taken by Felipe Calderon are the best and, especially, are made with the best possible mental capacity. * Journalist
Source: Contralínea 217 / January 23, 2011
The teacher
José
| economic policy for the financial sector | | |
Thursday, January 20, 2011 |
During the presentation, held in the old courtyard of the school of Law, UNAM, San Ildefonso, the presenters agreed with the failure of state reform and, as stressed the historian Lorenzo Meyer, citing a part of the book by Munoz Ledo, "distorting the State is easier than change it." Meyer agreed with Muñoz Ledo's conviction that any change failed a regression in the political system. "It the case of Mexican reality. Is the case with the idea of \u200b\u200ba failed state, "said the analyst at the Colegio de Mexico. Andrés Manuel López Obrador, a former 2006 presidential candidate and leader of the leftist social movement coincided with the exhaustion of state and regime. "We are in a process of progressive degradation. We are in a decline of the state. And I agree with the idea of \u200b\u200bradical route proposed by Muñoz Ledo, on the understanding that the radical pathway is not violent, "said Lopez Obrador. At the same idea, Alejandro Encinas, current candidate for governor of the State of Mexico, stressed that the radical way "requires of a peaceful movement. " Encinas noted that the decline of the state has increased and stressed the negotiations which led the government of Felipe Calderón with the owners of the media to create a perception that it is a legitimate government.
Source:
The food war
bancocracia the overall survival results revolutions
Alfredo Jalife-Rahme
A child puts the price of a sack of rice at a shop in Calcutta, where the value of food has gone in aumentoFoto Reuters
A
Background: For almost three years, Under the Microscope (16 and 23/04/2008), and five months before the official
emergence of the global financial crisis on Wall Street created, warned the food war
sponsored by the oligopolistic cartel food the Anglo-Saxon duo (United States and Britain) and its six multinationals that control grain and cereals in the world. added that "a chart of food
cartel would have to head to Danields Archer Midland, Unilever (eye!) Grand Metropolitan (Pillsbury), Cargill, and Cadbury. " Please do not lose sight of Unilever for what follows.
Then I pointed out that "massive increases in food prices occurred in parallel to record bets with futures contracts, by the ominous
hedge-funds (hedge funds) in the stock of agricultural commodities Chicago Board of Trade and the Kansas-axis Agromercantil Minneapolis-London. " Four days later
formulated to Stratfor, neoliberal center of Texas-Israeli thinking, implied the deployment of a war
where food would come out as victors U.S. and the European Union, food hoarders highest globally (
The geopolitics of rising oil and foodfood war, which climbed Goldman Sachs (Under the Microscope, 04/08/1910), began when the parasitic global bancocracia insolvency knew long before the official date of its emergence from 15 September 2008 that they knew the central banks of U.S. and UK (as Wikileaks
). Facts:
Does Anglo
food war is designed to China and India, as well as the OPEC (as suggested by Stratfor)? Paul Polman, executive director of the powerful Anglo-Dutch transnational Unilever food (super sic!), With nearly a whopping 40 billion dollars in revenue in 2009 (now to be much more), was lambasted in the neoliberal Forum Davos World Economic (indeed, more agonizing than ever) that
short speculators in the City were damaging (sic) the long-term needs of the business to change the way they operate
(
cultural parentheses on the high lethality financial short selling
(
short-selling), which is taught in schools including
academics, and is selling assets pledged to third parties (v.gr stock brokerages and investment banks) with the intent to repurchase at a later date as the return of the pledge given. This speculation lethal (for the amounts involved leveraged unidirectional exercising artificial prices) allows artificial price swings where speculators earn their dizzying changes (to the sale and repurchase) thanks to the collusion of the global bancocracia fauna provides all sorts of speculative necrophiliac credit facilities at the expense of consumers exsangües on your savings. This is one of many entertainment devices totalitarianism neoliberal left stranded most of the world population. financieristic In postmodernity there is nothing more barbaric than shorting
(one of the favorite casino games from the slavery of the Rothschild banking and global operator George Soros) should be banished from the face of the Earth civilized societies. In his interview to British newspaper of yore, the Dutchman said Polman
short speculators have contributed to food inflation
And who profit at the expense of people to live (sic) a decent life (sic)
, which is difficult to understand if you want to work for long-term interests (sic) of society
. He worries that
climate change and water shortages
affect tomato production by Unilever, which buys 6 percent of global supply. In his view, the European Union subsidies have created distortions (sic) the market (sic) that work against the needs of the developing world
. And where left
subsidies by more than 800 billion dollars for a duration of 10 years Baby
Bush gave his techno-agricultural-food industry and put the final nail in the coffin of aggro
Neoliberal Mexico mortally wounded by the folly of NAFTA?
deduction is a truism that higher food and oil is the result of hyperinflation concocted by Ben Shalom Bernanke, the controversial governor of the Federal Reserve (Jeremy Warner, The Fed feeds the catastrophe of rapidly rising raw materials ,
The Daily Telegraph, 10/29/1910 ) perverse to try to rescue the global bancocracia insolvent, which led to the collateral damage of social unrest in several developing
and catalyzed survival revolution ( by famine) in Tunisia (see Under the Microscope, 16/01/1911).
After reviewing the various causes of rising
classic food-droughts, floods, bioethanol, rising gasoline, bulk purchase of China and India, etc.-and regardless of the blatant speculation financieristic
Postclassic, John W. Schoen, chief producer of the MSNBC television (01/14/1911) and who seems to belong to both schools of thought of the Polish-French Marie Antoinette as Stratfor,
argues that de-veloped world (sic) has come out unscathed with
a modest price (super sic!) in the U.S. because
eat more processed foods, in addition to the consumer average American spends 13 percent of their disposable income on food compared to over 50 percent of the least developed countries (01/14/1911). " No Comments!
Best of insanity globalist: before the revolt of students unemployed in Tunisia and regenerative immolations
, the American Robert Zoellick, World Bank director and one of the satraps of totalitarian neoliberal
urged to avoid protectionist measures (
The free-market can still feed the world ,
The Financial Times,
5.1.11). To see if it convinces the outdated Zoellick sync when the hungry of the earth that the free market
going to save and nurture.
How, then, it will protect affected countries, and not only the hike, but none of the revolutions survival (of hambuna)
? "Shielding
financially to the tortilla,
itamita style as Calderon has chosen? Not everything is insanity in Anglo-Saxon narrative and Rowena Mason (
The Daily Telegraph, 01/17/1911) argues that food inflation is destined to become a political issue
, rather than financial or economist.
Conclusion: The
jasmine revolution in Tunisia
genuine revolution-survival (starvation) of unemployed university-placed U.S. and GB to the insurmountable dilemma that many of his unfailing geopolitical allies in the world can be humiliatingly ousted because of rising food speculative, forcing to affected countries to resort to purely political
and national safeguard protective. Times are political, not financial.
Source:
http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/01/19/index.php?section=opinion&article=022o1pol